FreeScope of Work Checklist for Subcontractor TradesGet the free guide →
CONTRACT RISK REVIEW

Find Risky Clauses
Before They Cost You

AI-powered contract risk review for general contractors. Flag risky clauses, missing scope, and commercial exposures with 99.5% accuracy on real construction contracts.

99.5% accuracy on risk identification
80% reduction in contract review time
2,221 risks caught across EllisDon's P3 portfolio

Get a Free Contract Risk Report

Book a 30-min demo and we'll run one of your active contracts through Risk Review live — flagged clauses, severity levels, and citations on your own documents.

Trusted by leading construction companies
The Contract Review Problem

Manual contract review is a liability

Bid day pressure and a 200-page contract package with supplementary conditions that arrive the night before. The current process is stacked against your team.

3–4 hrs

Manual contract review per pursuit

Your team reads every clause line-by-line on a deadline — and still misses the supplementary conditions buried at the back that change everything.

$200K+

Unpriced risk becomes margin loss

Schedule penalties, extended warranty periods, and coordination requirements that weren't priced erode margin long after the bid is locked.

100+ pages

Supplementary conditions nobody fully reads

Supplementary conditions modify payment terms, LD caps, and warranty scope — and they arrive late. They're the most expensive pages on any project.

What We Flag

Every risk cited to the exact clause and page

Liquidated damages with no cap on GC exposure
Supplementary conditions that override base contract terms
Extended warranty periods beyond industry standard
Coordination responsibilities assigned entirely to GC
P3 Healthcare Facility · Contract Risk Review/Risk Report
Sample
2
Documents reviewed
47
Risks flagged
6
High severity
28 mins
Review time
Risk / Clause
Severity
Source
Liquidated damages: $15,000/day with no cap on GC exposure.
Recommend cap at 5% of contract value. Owner standard; negotiate before execution.
Redline drafted
High
SC-12, Art. 9.4
GC bears full coordination burden for all owner-specified subcontractors, including delays caused by owner.
Standard position: owner bears delay costs for owner-caused actions. Supplementary condition SC-07 overrides CCDC base clause 6.2.
Redline drafted
High
SC-07 vs. CCDC 6.2
365-day warranty period with no carve-outs for weather damage or normal wear.
Industry standard is 12 months. Extended period with no exclusions creates open-ended liability.
Medium
Spec 01 78 00 §4.1
15% holdback on all progress draws. Payment terms: NET-60.
Standard: 10% holdback / NET-30. 50% above standard holdback rate creates significant cash-flow exposure on a long-duration P3.
Medium
Art. 9.3
99.5% accuracy on risk identification · 100% citation-backed outputs · Redlines exported to Word
Book a 30-min demo →
One missed clause = $200K+ in unpriced risk.
Provision Risk Review = $200 per project.
See It In Action

From contract package to clean redline — same day

Risk Review workflow showing contract upload and risk flagging with citation sources

Upload contracts, specs, and supplementary conditions together

Risk Review processes the full contract package — base contract, supplementary conditions, specs, and drawings — and reconciles them against each other. Conflicts between documents are surfaced automatically.

Risk Review flagging high severity clauses with severity levels and default position comparison

Every risky clause flagged, cited, and severity-ranked

High, medium, and low severity flags. Every finding traced to the exact clause, section, and page. Your team sees where the issue is and how it compares to your preferred contract position — in seconds, not hours.

Risk Review generating redlines and RFIs from flagged contract risks

From risk flag to redline — no blank page, no formatting time

For every flagged clause, Risk Review drafts a suggested redline based on your preferred positions. Export to Word for negotiation. Draft RFIs for unclear requirements. Your team edits and ships same day.

How It Works

From contract package to redline in three steps

No IT integration. No six-month pilot. Most teams see flagged risks on their own contract in the first 30-minute demo.

STEP 01

Upload the contract package

Drop in the base contract, supplementary conditions, specs, and drawings. Risk Review processes the full package and enables cross-document conflict detection.

STEP 02

AI flags risks by severity

Every risky clause is ranked High, Medium, or Low. Each flag is cited to the exact source — page, section, and document — and compared against your preferred contract position.

STEP 03

Generate redlines and RFIs, export

Provision drafts suggested redlines for flagged clauses. Export to Word, PDF, or Procore comment tables. Your team negotiates from a position of strength, not a blank page.

Real Customers. Real Numbers.

What contract managers unlock with Provision

Actual results from published Provision case studies, not vendor projections.

$1.8M
Saved per year across P3 projects
2,221 risks caught. $100K+ in claims avoided.
EllisDon
Faster through pursuits
4–8 hours of manual line-by-line contract review, cut down to same-day turnaround.
Cleveland Construction
Faster bid/no-bid decisions
2,400+ risks found. 32 deal-breakers identified before committing resources.
NAC Constructors

Platform-wide: $100B+ in project value reviewed · 1M+ risks identified · 66,000+ documents processed.

Why Not ChatGPT?

Generic AI fails on contract review

How Provision stacks up against generic AI on the contract review workflows that matter.

 
ChatGPT / Copilot
Provision
Accuracy on real construction contracts
Unreliable
99.5%
Handles supplementary conditions
No
Yes — reconciled against base contract
Risk severity classification
No
High / Medium / Low
Citation-backed outputs
No
100% — exact clause + page
Redline generation
No
Yes, same-day turnaround
Cross-document conflict detection
No
Specs, drawings + contracts together
Data security
Consumer-grade
SOC2 Type II

Provision's 99.5% accuracy figure is measured against ground-truth reviews on real construction contracts including supplementary conditions, P3 agreements, and standard-form contracts (CCDC, AIA) across customers including EllisDon and one of the top-10 ENR GCs. Full methodology available on request.

In Their Own Words

How contract teams describe the shift

Reconciling supplementary conditions against base documents saves me six hours per contract.

Ryan Di Lella
Manager of Contract Risk, EllisDon
EllisDon
Read the full case study →

Provision has streamlined our contract reviews, saved us countless hours, and reduced our team’s stress. … Provision has become an overhead expense that just makes us better.

Cleveland Construction
National commercial general contractor
Cleveland Construction
Read the full case study →

Something that would have taken a week to page turn and go through, now it’s being done literally in a couple of days. We can now evaluate unlimited jobs.

Don White
Chief Estimator, NAC Constructors
NAC Constructors
Read the full case study →
Read Provision reviews on G2

What contract teams say on G2

Allowing us to understand better the terms and conditions of tender documentation to refine pricing, assumptions and opportunities.

Arnaud M., General Counsel

Provision simplifies my inquiries by allowing me to frame them into a single question, and then it performs all the document searching. It's really efficient and a great use of my time.

Mark H.

Being able to upload multiple documents that searches across all of them for anything I am looking for. It is also great for copying and pasting text from locked files which saves tons of time.

Michael L., Assistant Bid Manager

Provision helps me find information quickly and always sources the right material within the contract, which saves me both time and money. I also find it very easy to train others on using Provision.

Bianca B., Manager of Operations

Provision's user friendly interface makes identifying, understanding and tracking contract risks a smooth, repeatable, process.

Anthony F., Digital Integration Coordinator

Being able to search for clauses and line items that have been missed previously has saved me hassle and it's backup support function where it provides the backup from the contract makes it easy to cut and paste in change management documents.

Al V., Branch Director
Common Questions

Answers before the call

What types of risks does Risk Review flag?

Risk Review covers contract review (schedule penalties, LD clauses, warranty obligations, coordination responsibilities, indemnity terms), estimator review (missing scope, ambiguous requirements, unfavorable trade coordination language), go/no-go review (deal-breaker identification, commercial exposure summary), subcontractor review, RFP review, and geotechnical report review. Every risk type has its own list with configurable criteria.

How does it handle supplementary conditions vs. the base contract?

Provision reviews supplementary conditions and the base contract together, not in isolation. When a supplementary condition modifies a base clause — extending warranty periods, increasing holdback, or shifting coordination liability — Provision surfaces the conflict with citations to both documents. This cross-document reconciliation is what takes 6 hours manually at EllisDon and is now same-day.

Does it generate redlines automatically?

Yes. For every flagged risk, Risk Review drafts a suggested redline based on your preferred contract positions. Your team edits and finalizes — the AI eliminates the blank-page problem and the formatting time. Redlines export to Word for immediate use in contract negotiation.

What's the difference between Risk Review and Scope Agent?

Risk Review focuses on contract risk — flagging unfavorable clauses, generating redlines, and reconciling supplementary conditions against base documents. Scope Agent focuses on scope completeness — building trade-split scope packages from drawings and specs so nothing gets missed on bid day. Both are part of the Provision platform and can be run on the same project.

Does it plug into Procore, Autodesk, and SharePoint?

Yes. Provision reads documents directly from Procore, Autodesk, and SharePoint. Risk reports, redlines, and RFI drafts export to PDF, Word, Excel, and comment tables — so outputs drop straight into your contract review workflow without copy-paste.

How long until our contract team sees real value?

No IT integration, no six-month pilot. Your 30-minute demo is with the Provision team, and we run one of your active contracts through Risk Review live — flagged clauses, severity levels, and citations on your own documents. Most customers complete their first live contract review in the first week of onboarding.

Catch risky clauses before they cost you.

Book a 30-minute call with the Provision team. We'll run one of your active contracts through Risk Review live — flagged clauses, severity levels, and redline suggestions on your own documents.

Book Your Demo
Platform pricing — contact sales.
YC-BackedSOC 2 Type IIReviewed on G2