NewRFI Agent is now available: drawing and spec conflicts, found before tenderRead the announcement →

The Scope Gap Index  /  Division 31

Division 31 · Earthwork · Q3 2026

What Scope Agent flagged in earthwork scope packages

49 Division 31 packages across 20 projects, generated between 17 July and 30 September 2026 for Provision customers, ranked by how often each job got flagged. Model flags, checked by a person on fewer than one item in a hundred. Where to look, not proof.

49

Division 31 packages across 20 projects, 17 July to 30 September 2026

49

of 49 had at least one flag from Scope Agent

628

flags in total: 381 inferred, 247 coordination

100%

of packages had at least one flag, the only division where every package did

Inferred means Scope Agent judged the job necessary and found no scope naming who does it. Coordination means it judged the job to sit between two trades. Neither is a confirmed omission on that project.

Ranked

Every earthwork package got a flag, and removal leads

Forty-nine of 49. Scope Agent flagged removal and disposal in 31 packages, 27 as inferred: excess spoil, unsuitable material, where it goes and who pays the tip. Utility connections follow at 29: the existing services in the dig and the tie-in at the property line. Shoring and access at 28, all 28 inferred: the documents call for a shored excavation and don’t say who engineers it.

Job flaggedPackagesInferredCoordinationShare flagged
Removal, demolition and disposal27 inferred · 8 coordination31 of 4927863%
Utility and service connections24 inferred · 16 coordination29 of 49241659%
Scaffolding, shoring and access28 inferred · 13 coordination28 of 49281357%
Testing, inspection and certification23 inferred · 4 coordination24 of 4923449%
Maintenance, warranty and spares22 inferred · 1 coordination23 of 4922147%
Temporary protection19 inferred · 8 coordination21 of 4919843%
Sealants, flashing and waterproofing joints13 inferred · 13 coordination18 of 49131337%
Anchors, embeds and connections5 inferred · 13 coordination17 of 4951335%
Blocking, backing and support10 inferred · 7 coordination16 of 4910733%
Shop drawings and submittals11 inferred · 0 coordination11 of 4911022%
Tolerances, joints and trade interfaces10 inferred · 2 coordination10 of 4910220%
Cleaning9 inferred · 0 coordination9 of 499018%
Penetrations, sleeves and firestopping6 inferred · 4 coordination9 of 496418%
Hoisting, lifting and delivery3 inferred · 0 coordination3 of 49306%
Openings, cutting and patching0 inferred · 3 coordination3 of 49036%

“Inferred” and “coordination” count packages with that kind of flag, and a package can have both, so the two columns can add to more than the total. The generic supply-versus-install topic (39 of 49) is left out; see the method note.

Beyond the ranking

Three things the table doesn’t tell you

1. Shoring and access: 28 flags, 28 inferred

In a division with ten shoring packages, Scope Agent still found 28 of 49 silent on who designs, installs and removes the shoring, the ramp and the haul road. Thirteen of those also carried a coordination flag, usually between the excavator and the shoring sub, which is at least an argument between two named parties.

2. Maintenance and warranty flagged in 23 packages, 22 inferred

Settlement after backfill, re-grading when it settles, maintaining the haul road and the silt fence through the job. The spec requires the result for a year and names nobody to come back.

3. Anchors are the coordination flag

Anchors, embeds and connections drew 17 flags, 13 coordination against five inferred. The tiebacks under the neighbour’s property, the pile cap the concrete sub pours on the foundation sub’s piles, the underpinning connection to the existing footing. Each one sits between earthwork and the structure.

The items in detail

What each flag usually points at, and how to close it in the scope

The six jobs flagged most often, after the generic supply-versus-install topic. Check your own documents before assuming a flag is right.

Removal, demolition and disposalflagged in 31 of 49 packages

Excess spoil off site, unsuitable material the geotechnical report hinted at, contaminated soil, the old foundations found in the dig. Twenty-seven inferred, eight coordination. State the disposal boundary, the unit rate for unsuitable material, and who classifies it.

Utility and service connectionsflagged in 29 of 49 packages

Locating and protecting existing services, the temporary disconnect, the tie-in to the municipal main at the property line, the dewatering discharge permit. Twenty-four inferred, 16 coordination. Name who locates, who protects and who pays for the strike.

Scaffolding, shoring and accessflagged in 28 of 49 packages

Engineered shoring, the excavation ramp, the haul road, the crane pad the structure sub needs. Twenty-eight inferred, 13 coordination. Say who engineers and installs the shoring, who maintains the ramp, and when the shoring comes out.

Testing, inspection and certificationflagged in 24 of 49 packages

Compaction testing, the geotechnical engineer’s inspection of the subgrade, the pile load test, the survey of the finished grade. Twenty-three inferred, four coordination. List every test, who orders it, who pays for a failure.

Maintenance, warranty and sparesflagged in 23 of 49 packages

Settlement and re-grading, erosion control through the job, the haul road. Twenty-two of the 23 flags were inferred. State the warranty on backfill and who returns for settlement.

Temporary protectionflagged in 21 of 49 packages

Protecting the subgrade from weather and traffic before the slab goes down, erosion and sediment control, protecting the neighbour’s property. Nineteen inferred, eight coordination. Say who protects what and for how long.

Writing the package rather than checking it? The excavation scope of work guide covers the dig, the shoring, the dewatering and the backfill, and the concrete scope of work guide picks up at the footing.

Method

How we counted

49 scope packages classified to MasterFormat Division 31, generated by Scope Agent between 17 July and 30 September 2026 on 20 of the 24 projects in the quarter’s cohort. Sixteen carried the trade label earthwork, ten shoring, seven special foundations, three soil stabilization, two soil treatment and two underpinning. Nine more carried a customer-specific label we couldn’t map to a standard trade; they’re counted here because the package itself was coded to the division. A package is one trade on one project, as it stood at quarter end, so a project typically contributes two or three earthwork packages. An item counts when Scope Agent flagged it as inferred or coordination. We grouped the items into sixteen topics by keyword, and one item can land in more than one topic.

49 packages on 20 projects clears our 20-package threshold for publishing a division, and one package moves a share by about two points. The bigger caution is composition: a shoring package and a bulk excavation package get flagged for different things, and this page blends them. These are Provision customers’ projects, and the numbers describe this sample only. A flag is Scope Agent’s judgment, checked by a person on fewer than one item in a hundred, so some flags will be wrong. We’ll update it every quarter.

See what Scope Agent flags in your own earthwork package

Upload your drawings and specs. Scope Agent flags the inferred and coordination scope before the bid leaves your office, and your estimator decides what’s real.

Book a Demo