Scope Agent, on a real school retrofit

Bricks & Bytes asked to see Scope Agent on a real project rather than a prepared demo file. Luigi La Corte put a 40-page school retrofit in front of it while the recording ran, then worked through what came back: the scope organized by trade, the gaps it flagged, and the source sheet behind every line item.

On Provision's internal validation set, measured against human-prepared scope sheets from real general contractor projects across North America, Scope Agent matched 97.01% of scope items. The traceability is the part that earns its place on bid day. A number an estimator cannot check is a number they cannot put in front of a subcontractor.

What the demo covers

• A 40-page school retrofit uploaded as one set, drawings and specifications together
• Requirements organized by trade, from demolition and concrete through to electrical and mechanical
• Explicit scope on the drawings, scope buried in the specifications, and inferred scope that has to happen but was never drawn
• Coordination scope: the work that falls between two subcontractor packages because neither one names it
• Every line item traced back to the sheet and section it came from, so an estimator can check the output instead of trusting it
• Scope Audit run against a bid that is already priced, flagging what looks missing before it goes out

The full write-up

Aren Deu's article on Bricks & Bytes covers the rest of the conversation, including where Scope Agent sits alongside an estimator's existing process and what it deliberately does not do.

More coverage of Provision is on the press page.